Thursday, July 2, 2026
Politics · Business · Security · Climate · Technology · Society
The AP Herald

THE AP HERALD

From the Asia-Pacific to the world.
Profile · Corporation · China

Rehabilitated at Home, Blacklisted Abroad: Alibaba's Split-Screen Year

Beijing spent five years bringing Alibaba to heel, then welcomed Jack Ma back into the fold. In June, the Pentagon named the company a Chinese military-linked entity — a reminder that the company's hardest audience now sits in Washington, not Beijing.

Abstract illustration of a cloud-network node diagram split by a jagged red line, evoking a divided map.
Illustration: The AP Herald

On June 9, 2026, the US Department of Defense re-issued an updated list of companies it says are linked to China's military, formally adding Alibaba alongside Baidu and BYD. It was not the first time: the same list had briefly appeared, then been abruptly withdrawn, in February 2026, timed conspicuously close to a planned presidential trip to Beijing. Alibaba's Hong Kong shares fell more than 3 percent on the February episode. The company's response in June was flat and categorical: "Alibaba is not a Chinese military company nor part of any military-civil fusion strategy." There is no equivalent penalty attached to the listing — no sanctions, no trading ban — but for a company spending billions to convince the world's data centers and cloud customers it is a trustworthy long-term infrastructure partner, the label itself is the cost.

The timing carries its own irony. Five years earlier, Alibaba was Beijing's problem child, not Washington's. Founder Jack Ma's public criticism of Chinese financial regulators in late 2020 triggered the abrupt suspension of Ant Group's blockbuster IPO, an antitrust fine, and a broader "common prosperity" crackdown that swept up Tencent, Meituan and Didi alongside Alibaba. China's market regulator did not confirm Alibaba had completed its formal "rectification" process until August 2024. The clearest signal that the freeze was over came in February 2025, when Xi Jinping met Ma and other private-sector leaders in Beijing and reiterated a line to the effect of get rich first, then worry about shared prosperity. By late June 2026, Ma was making a folksy public reappearance — planting rice outside Hangzhou alongside senior Alibaba and Ant Group executives — a symbolic, low-key event that would have been unthinkable during the crackdown's peak.

The Business Underneath the Politics

Alibaba's revenue over the trailing twelve months through mid-2026 runs to roughly $142.7 billion, generated across four units: China e-commerce (Taobao and Tmall), international commerce (AliExpress, Lazada, Trendyol), cloud computing, and a catch-all "other" segment spanning logistics, grocery and health. The company employs roughly 131,000 people, about 8,000 more than a year earlier. Its market capitalization has moved unusually sharply even by tech-stock standards — figures from different points in June and July 2026 range from roughly $227 billion to $266 billion, reflecting genuine volatility as much as any single "true" number. What has stayed constant is the pressure on Alibaba's original business: domestically, Taobao and Tmall hold roughly a third of Chinese e-commerce, but PDD Holdings — parent of Pinduoduo and Temu — has climbed to over a fifth of the market, and ByteDance's Douyin e-commerce arm now moves goods at volumes comparable to JD.com and growing faster. Alibaba is fighting what analysts describe as a two-front war for a market it once dominated outright.

Betting the Company on AI

That competitive pressure is a large part of why Alibaba has committed so heavily to artificial intelligence. Its Qwen family of open-source AI models passed one billion cumulative downloads on the developer platform Hugging Face by March 2026, capturing more than half of global open-source model downloads that month — a scale that puts Alibaba, alongside DeepSeek and Moonshot's Kimi, among the handful of labs setting the pace in open-weight AI worldwide. CEO Eddie Wu has said the company is likely to overshoot its own three-year, roughly $53 billion commitment to AI and cloud infrastructure, and has described a shift from "early-stage AI investment" into "full commercialization."

"It's too early to determine where the largest profits from AI will ultimately emerge, so we're not betting on a single winner." — Joe Tsai, Alibaba chairman, VivaTech Paris, June 19, 2026, on the case for Alibaba's full-stack approach across chips, cloud, models and applications

Tsai framed the opportunity in blunt terms at the same event, describing AI's addressable market as potentially worth $50 trillion — roughly half of global GDP, on his reasoning, if AI meaningfully substitutes for human productivity and intelligence. Whether or not that figure holds up, it captures the scale of ambition behind Alibaba's spending: this is a company trying to be the default cloud and AI layer for a large share of the Chinese economy, at a moment when its home-turf e-commerce business is under sustained attack and its overseas cloud business has actually lost ground, with Alibaba Cloud's global market share slipping from around 6 percent in 2020 to roughly 4 percent by 2026, even as absolute revenue keeps growing.

That combination — a rehabilitated relationship with Beijing, a genuinely important position in open-source AI, an e-commerce core under siege from cheaper and faster domestic rivals, and a fresh adversarial designation from the Pentagon — makes Alibaba a harder company to summarize in 2026 than at almost any point in its history. It is neither the chastened also-ran the 2021 crackdown seemed to promise nor the untouchable national champion its AI headlines might suggest. The company's own bet is that full-stack breadth — owning pieces of chips, cloud, models and consumer apps rather than dominating any single layer outright — is the safest position to hold while both the competitive landscape at home and the political landscape abroad keep shifting under it. Whether that breadth is a strength or a hedge born of not being sure where to concentrate will likely become clearer only once one of AI, e-commerce or geopolitics forces Alibaba to choose.